Monster Hunter World Graphics Settings
Monster Hunter: World is one of the biggest games on PC right now, and it's just got even bigger with the launch of its giant Iceborne expansion. Then, if you're been thinking nigh jumping into Capcom's dinosaur-hunting / hat-making sim, but aren't sure if your graphics carte du jour tin can run it properly, and so have a read of my Monster Hunter: World PC operation guide beneath.
Here, you'll find everything y'all need to know almost how to become the best operation and the smoothest frame rates from almost all of today's best graphics cards, likewise as a couple of oldies I've still got knocking around in my closet. Together, we'll see if they're a mighty, frame-slaying Rathalos or a paralyzing little Paratoad. I've likewise included some tips on which settings you can turn off to assistance boost performance, also as how many extra frames you can get by switching on Monster Hunter: World'south DLSS support with a compatible Nvidia RTX card.
Monster Hunter World PC requirements
Before we get started, though, let's remind ourselves of Monster Hunter: World'south PC requirements. These are the same PC requirements for Iceborne, too, and then you don't need to worry about upgrading your PC when it comes to breaking in the expansion. Every bit you can see from the minimum PC requirements below, you should exist able to get Monster Hunter: Earth running on even quite elderly systems. The Nvidia GTX 760 came out in 2013, subsequently all, and so even those of your with PCs approaching their fifth of sixth birthday should be expert to go here. Nevertheless, those targeting at least 30fps at 1920x1080 on High will need a PC with Capcom'southward recommended specs.
Minimum specs:
OS: Windows vii - 10 (64-chip required)
Processor: Intel Cadre i5-4460 or Intel Cadre i3-9100F / AMD FX-6300 or AMD Ryzen three 3200G
Memory: 8GB RAM
Graphics: Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 or GTX 1050 / AMD Radeon R7 260X or RX 560
Recommended specs:
OS: Windows seven - x (64-fleck required)
Processor: Intel Core i7-3770 or Intel Core i3-8350 or Intel Core i3-9350F / AMD Ryzen five 1500X or Ryzen five 3400G
Memory: 8GB RAM
Graphics: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (3GB) or GTX 1650 / AMD Radeon RX 480 or RX 570
Again, this should be fairly achievable in the vast majority of cases, particularly when a 3GB GTX 1060 and 4GB RX 570 can exist found for less than ii hundred quid these days. In fact, I reckon Capcom are underselling themselves a bit here, as my ain tests show that you tin actually get a lot more than 30fps from these cards at 1920x1080. Indeed, to striking 60fps on High at 1080p, all you need is a 6GB GTX 1060, or an 8GB RX 580 - and that was without employing whatever of the operation boosting tricks I've outlined below.
Monster Hunter World: how to get the all-time performance
Monster Hunter: World comes with four principal graphics presets: Low, Mid, Loftier and Highest. However, in that location's one advanced setting in detail that has a noticeable touch on on the game's overall performance: Volume Rendering Quality.
To use the game's official parlance, Volume Rendering Quality "adjusts the rendering quality of volumetric fog", which isn't exactly helpful. What it's actually referring to is the game'south lighting furnishings, covering everything from sunbeams cascading in through the cracks of its dense jungle canopies to the dust and fume of its vast deserts and towering volcanoes.
Fog plays a large role in that, too, peculiarly when you're nosing around its dirty caves and underground monster warrens. Just what this setting really boils down to is giving Monster Hunter: World's lush environments a sense of realistic depth as you gaze out toward the horizon. When book rendering is gear up as low as information technology can go (every bit you can see in the images beneath), everything looks a bit apartment.
Still, by switching Volume Rendering Quality down from High to Off, I clawed back an average of 12fps, which is pretty good going for altering just a single setting. Otherwise, most settings make very footling difference on their own, so much so that you might as well just drop downwardly an entire quality setting if you find your PC's struggling a bit.
Monster Hunter: World PC performance
With all that in mind, and so, let's acuminate our blades and go and make ourselves some new dinosaur pants. To see how each graphics bill of fare fared, click the links below or bear on scrolling. Every bit always, the chief aim hither is to detect the all-time combination of settings to reach a shine 60fps at 1920x1080, 2560x1440 and 4K. Not all graphics cards will exist able to striking 60fps at every resolution, of course, but for each carte du jour I've outlined the all-time case scenario for what kind of frame rate y'all tin can look to see at a number of different graphics settings.
As for my own PC, I tested each GPU with an Intel Core i5-8600K and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance RAM, plus all the latest graphics drivers and Windows 10 updates installed. And don't forget, if you want to find out more than nearly how to make the almost of your hunting experience, make sure to have a read of our guides team's in-depth Monster Hunter World Iceborne guide.
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (4GB)
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB)
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- AMD Radeon R9 270
- AMD Radeon R9 290
- AMD Radeon RX 570 (8GB)
- AMD Radeon RX 580 (8GB)
- AMD Radeon RX 590
- AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (4GB and 8GB)
- AMD Radeon RX 5700
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Ah, the trusty Nvidia GeForce GTX 970. Nonetheless a pop staple of many a gaming PC, this particular GTX 970 is Zotac'southward Dual Fan model. Information technology has 4GB of retentiveness, a base clock speed of 1076 MHz and a heave of 1216 MHz, making information technology slightly faster than Nvidia's reference specification (which has a base clock of 1050 MHz and a boost of 1178 MHz). As a outcome, this particular fix of test results may vary by a couple of frames or so compared to other GTX 970s out there.
Still, I was pretty impressed by the GTX 970's performance. It's getting on a bit long in the molar at present in terms of speed and overall memory (the GTX 1070 has 8GB of memory, for example), but it proved itself highly capable of delivering fast, smooth frame rates at both 1920x1080 and, to an extent, 2560x1440. Here'southward how I got on.
Tin can I play this at 1920x1080?
Yes. While the GTX 970 tin simply about handle Monster Hunter: World's Highest graphics setting, producing a rough average of xxx-35fps out in the field with resolution scaling fix to High or 35-40fps when the scaling's ready to prioritise the resolution, this carte du jour is definitely about comfy on MHW's High setting.
Hither, I got a smooth 50-60fps running around the game's early jungles, making for some very smooth monster tracking. The resolution scaling is set to prioritise the resolution by default on this graphics choice, and switching it over to Loftier didn't actually make much of a difference in overall speed.
Battles weren't quite every bit silky when I was getting up close and personal with some of MHW'due south larger dinos, but information technology never dipped beneath 40fps when the scaling was prioritising the resolution. I'd advise sticking the scaling on Loftier, though, as here I saw a baseline of around 45fps. If you set up the volume rendering to Low as well, you can squeeze around an extra 5 frames out of it, too, pushing information technology closer to a baseline of 50fps.
Tin I play this at 2560x1440?
Yeah, but the all-time frame rate you're going to get is with the game'due south Mid setting. That's still pretty decent for such an quondam graphics card, but you're looking at 45fps tops when out in the world, with lows of around 35fps. Again, tinkering with the volume rendering will help push button the frame rate into a more comfortable twoscore-50fps territory, simply High was only besides demanding for this particular menu.
I wouldn't recommend settling for Low at this resolution either, as information technology only looks awful. Here, the volume rendering is off past default, sending the frame charge per unit sky high to 80-90fps depending on what was happening onscreen, but the visual trade-off simply isn't worth it - at to the lowest degree in my eyes anyway. Yes, there are things yous can do to brand it look marginally better, only Mid is definitely a definitely a better place to start with this card.
Tin can I play this at 4K?
Alas, 4K is too much for the GTX 970, and so stick to lower resolutions.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Ah, the skilful old GTX 1050 Ti. It's a bit onetime hat now the GTX 1650 and GTX 1650 Super have arrived, but it continues to be the second nearly popular graphics carte du jour among Steam users. Alas, even the 4GB version of this carte du jour struggles to play Monster Hunter: World at a decent speed, so you may find it'due south worth upgrading to a newer GTX 16-serial card (or indeed ane of AMD'south new RX 5000 GPUs) if Monster Hunter's Iceborne expansion is on your to-play list this year.
Tin can I play this at 1920x1080?
Yes, but yous'll have to brand do with lower graphics settings if you're after a smooth 60fps. On Depression, for example, I saw an average frame charge per unit of 78fps out in the field, but this dropped to just 38fps when I bumped the quality up to Mid. That said, you could probably get away with Loftier if you lot don't mind a frame rate around the 30fps mark, as here I saw an average of 36fps, but it'due south not exactly platonic when fighting all those large dinos.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Barely, but it is doable. Once again, Low is your all-time bet hither, averaging 57fps out in the field. Bump it up to Medium and you're only looking at effectually 34fps, sadly.
Can I play this at 4K?
Sadly not, unless you fancy a 20fps slideshow, of course.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB)
Another Zotac carte, this time the miniature version of the 6GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 - our best graphics card runner-upward for all-time value 1440p gaming. Naturally, this one's a lot smaller than other GTX 1060s out there, and only has a unmarried fan, so its performance may non be quite as nippy as slightly beefier versions of the aforementioned card.
Indeed, this GTX 1060 Mini has the same base of operations and boost clock speed every bit Nvidia's reference model, coming in at 1506 MHz and 1708 MHz respectively. As such, these results are probably on the more than conservative side compared to other GTX 1060s out there, merely information technology should still give us a pretty good idea of the bare minimum nosotros can expect from this type of card. Indeed, Capcom recommends having at least a 3GB model of the GTX 1060 for Monster Hunter: World, but I was pleased to see the 6GB version performs well over and above the rather minor expectations I mentioned at the first of this article.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Absolutely. High is where the GTX 1060 is probably most comfortable, hit a consistent 60fps in both the main hub environment of Astera and in the wider jungles that lie beyond information technology. Regardless of what resolution scaling option I had enabled, I saw highs of around 65-68fps on some cases, and it rarely dipped beneath that 60fps sweetspot.
Information technology's pretty amenable to playing on Highest, too, although here you're looking at an absolutely maximum of effectually 50fps with resolution scaling set up to Loftier, if not something closer to 40fps-ish when you're human knee-deep in Pukei-Pukei dung. That'southward still perfectly playable, to exist honest, and information technology's not like the frame rate suddenly tanks when you're slicing and dicing bigger beasties either. Besides, yous can ever chop the volume rendering down to Low and get an extra five or and then frames out of it to assistance keep things feeling nice and smooth.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Y'all can indeed, but with a couple of compromises. Highest is as well much for this particular GTX 1060. The frame charge per unit struggled in the 25-28fps region with the resolution scaling gear up to High, and even when it rose to around 35-38fps when I switched the scaling over to prioritise the resolution, I saw a visible drop in sharpness that made everything look a bit fuzzy and nasty.
Instead, you'll become a meliorate-looking motion picture and smoother frame rates past dropping the graphics preset down to High. Hither, I got a decent 40fps while I was out and nigh chopping up Anjanaths, regardless of resolution scaling setting, and fiddling with the book rendering meant I could push information technology a fraction higher up to effectually 45fps.
Dropping everything down to Mid didn't really ameliorate much, either, every bit even here the frame rate tended to settle on a rough average of 40fps no matter whether I was out in the wilds or hanging out in Astera. Every bit a result, you might too stick with High and take reward of all its lovely, juicy details rather than try and squeeze an extra couple of frames out of Mid.
If you're really desperate to go 60fps, there'due south always the option of settling for MHW's Depression setting, but as I described on the previous folio, this is about as ugly every bit existence vommed on past a Keen Jagras. Yeah, y'all get a steady frame rate in the 70-80fps surface area, merely trust me, it'due south just non worth it.
Can I play this at 4K?
Merely about, but you'll become a much ameliorate experience sticking with lower resolutions. Mid volition get you an boilerplate of 34fps, but really, you're looking at Depression for the smoothest experience, which seems silly considering what you can become at 1080p and 1440p.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Asus' take on the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 is slightly beefier than most. Not just is it absolutely ginormous thanks to its three fans, merely it's also one of the fastest GTX 1070s effectually, boasting a base clock speed of 1632 MHz and a heave clock of 1835 MHz. Nvidia'due south reference spec, for comparison purposes, starts at just 1506 MHz base of operations and 1683 MHz boost. It's as well faster than the reference specification for its more than powerful sibling, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, as well, which has clock speeds of 1607 MHz and 1683 MHz respectively.
As such, this version of the GTX 1070 is probably one of the amend-example scenarios for this type of carte du jour, so don't be surprised if other models tin can't quite match information technology frame-for-frame. That said, even this one struggled to get much beyond 40fps on college graphics settings at 2560x1440, and so those after true 1440p perfection volition accept to push the gunkhole out even further to get that all-important 60fps on Highest.
Tin I play this at 1920x1080?
Yes indeedy. This particular GTX 1070 did a brilliant job handling Monster Hunter: World'southward Highest setting, producing a stable 60-65fps in the hub world of Astera and between 55-60fps out in the jungles.
I saw a few dips to 50fps when tussling with some of the game'south more jumbo monsters when they were surrounded by dozens of petty mini ones in the same expanse, but information technology's non something I would have noticed without the help of a frame charge per unit counter. For those after the best frame rates, though, I'd recommend setting the resolution scaling to prioritise resolution, rather than its default position of High.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Yep, and you tin fifty-fifty do it on High without taking a massive hitting on the frame rate. Settling betwixt 50-60fps depending on the size and calibration of the scene at hand, resolution scaling fabricated little difference here - information technology was a touch faster prepare to resolution priority rather than Loftier, but we're talking a departure of one or two frames - and then you can pretty much go out it equally is and still get those buttery-fast speeds.
Naturally, Mid was fifty-fifty better, reaching as high every bit 70fps when noodling about the canteen and armoury in Astera, only I even so saw a few dips to l-odd fps in the heat of battle, then y'all might also go for High and savor those prettier graphics.
Highest, on the other hand, is doable, but non nearly as smooth as High. Here, I saw a perfectly playable range of between 30-45fps with resolution scaling on High, which and so shifted upward to 35-45fps when I prioritised resolution.
That's pretty expert as far as I'grand concerned, and there's always the option of dropping the volume rendering to inch information technology up a bit higher, too. I certainly didn't fell much of a loss when playing on this graphics setting, simply if 60fps is the be all and stop all for y'all, I'd advise sticking to High.
Can I play this at 4K?
Just most, but why settle for an average of 36fps on Mid, when you can get a much smoother looking game at 1080p or 1440p?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Despite all third party Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti cards sharing the same base of operations and boost clock speeds (1607 MHz and 1683 MHz respectively) due to a weird dominion Nvidia fabricated upward upon their release (presumably so they wouldn't swallow into GTX 1080 territory), EVGA's SC Gaming model manages to sort of skirt round this thanks to their Precision XOC auto-tuning software, which helps to optimise the card for better performance.
In the interests of keeping things fair, though, I ran this card at its default speeds without tinkering with whatsoever of its Precision settings, and so the post-obit results should exist broadly representative of most other GTX 1070Tis out there. EVGA's model also comes with some extra cooling mechanisms to go along things nice and nippy, but I doubt it volition make a huge divergence to the overall frame rates you can expect.
Tin can I play this at 1920x1080?
Y'all betcha. The GTX 1070 Ti made absolute mincemeat of Monster Hunter: World at this resolution, sustaining a smooth 65-75fps on Highest regardless of resolution scaling setting.
Even out in the field when I was out in the field getting hammered by the almighty Rathian, the GTX 1070 Ti kept its cool and never dipped below 60fps once. If you've got a monitor with a 75Hz refresh rate, you'll almost certainly be able to take reward of it here.
Tin I play this at 2560x1440?
Yup, and this time you can get a flawless 60fps on High instead of the occasional dip to 50fps like with the regular GTX 1070. High refresh charge per unit monitor peeps won't be able to enjoy quite such loftier frame rates here, but I withal saw a regular 65fps in both Astera and the wider world outside, which is withal pretty tasty as far equally I'thou concerned. Yep, I saw a few dips to 55fps when bigger beasties rocked up onscreen, just you wouldn't detect unless you had a frame rate counter ticking abroad in the corner of the screen.
Where the GTX 1070Ti actually comes into its own is when you start pushing into the game's Highest graphics settings. 60fps at this resolution is nevertheless too much for this item menu, but whereas the GTX 1070 varied between 30-45fps on this setting, the GTX 1070Ti pulled its socks upwards to a much more stable average of 45fps on High and resolution priority scaling alike.
There were still a few regular lows of 40fps when it came to tangoing with some of the larger monsters, only the smaller variation in speed made everything feel smoother and less choppy as a result. If 45fps isn't fast enough for you, at that place'southward always the option of setting the volume rendering to Depression to push button it up closer to 50fps, but for me, that tiny increase in operation isn't really worth the loss of visuals.
Can I play this at 4K?
Sorta, but just like every other mid-to-loftier-end GTX card we've looked at and so far, Mid is the best yous're going to get at this resolution, and even then you're not breaking much above the mid-30s when it comes to boilerplate frame charge per unit. So do yourself a favour and stick to 1440p or 1080p for the best monster chopping.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
The GTX 1080 may take since been replaced twice over in the terminal yr by two separate Nvidia RTX cards, but the GTX 1080 is still an absolutely stonking GPU in its own right. It may not be able to take advantage of Monster Hunter: World'due south DLSS characteristic, merely unless you lot had your sights set on playing information technology in 4K, there's still enough to like here.
To examination Monster Hunter: World, I've got Zotac's AMP Extreme edition. With a base clock speed of 1771MHz and a heave of 1911MHz, this is one of the better case scenarios you'll probably run across from a GTX 1080, but like I said back with the GTX 1070, I doubt y'all're going to be disappointed with the card's operation at 1080p and 1440p, regardless of which model you lot happen to have in your PC.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Silly question. Of course information technology can. Whack information technology upwardly to Highest and enjoy a sugariness, sweetness average of 70fps.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
You lot absolutely can. Y'all might notice it chugs a chip on Highest at this resolution, every bit I only saw an average of 50fps during my tests, simply that quickly shot up to a lovely polish 67fps on High.
Tin I play this at 4K?
Aye, merely let the rest of the GTX family, you'll have to settle for Mid at this resolution. High is doable, averaging effectually 37fps, but Mid is merely a touch smoother at 40fps. Really, though, you'll get a much prettier looking game by sticking with 1440p.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Despite being less than a year sometime, the GTX 1650 is already a bit onetime hat in the face of the contempo release of the GTX 1650 Super, but this budget 1080p graphics card still puts in a pretty skilful operation when it comes to tackling the behemothic dinos of Monster Hunter: World'south Iceborne expansion.
This Zotac OC model is i of the cheapest GTX 1650 cards y'all can buy correct now, but it does take a slightly higher boost clock speed than Nvidia's reference specification, coming in at 1695MHz as opposed to 1665MHz. This shouldn't brand a huge divergence, though, and then I'm pretty confident you lot'll be able to accept the results beneath equally the blank minimum kind of performance you tin can expect to see from all GTX 1650s you lot tin buy today.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Absolutely. Yous'll become the best balance between performance and graphical fidelity on Mid at this resolution, where I saw an average of around 53fps out and about in the field, simply considering High will notwithstanding get you a decent average of 48fps, you lot could probably get away with that instead if you lot really want to push the boat out.
Alas, Highest is too much for this carte du jour, every bit its measly 4GB of retentiveness isn't really enough to handle Monster Hunter: Globe's top texture pack. Indeed, I got a VRAM warning when I tried bumping it up to this setting during my testing, and only averaged about 33fps with lows of 27fps.
Tin I play this at 2560x1440?
Just about, but not really. Mid will get you an average of 32fps if y'all fancy it, just otherwise you're looking at Low here.
Can I play this at 4K?
Sadly not - unless you desire to puke your guts up similar the Nifty Jagras, I'd recommend sticking to lower resolutions here.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660
The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 is a pretty great every bit far as 1080p graphics cards get, even if it'southward now been supplanted by the marginally faster GTX 1660 Super. Even so, when it comes to chopping up dinosaurs and making fancy pants out of their crusty old hides, the GTX 1660 makes a damn fine cutting tool.
On test today is Gigabyte's regular edition of the GTX 1660, which has exactly the same specs as Nvidia's reference specification. Equally a result, those of yous with faster GTX 1660s will probably see slightly better results than what I've outlined below, so this should be taken equally the accented bare minimum kind of experience you can expect from this card instead of a all-time instance scenario. Either way, though, you're in for some loftier octane activity regardless of what blazon of card you lot've got.
Tin I play this at 1920x1080?
You certain can, friend. High will ensure y'all stay well above the 60fps line with an average of 72fps, but Highest will still go you a very playable average of 51fps while you're at information technology.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Another large aye to this one, although hither you lot'll probably notice yourself most comfortable downward on Mid, where I saw an boilerplate of 52fps. Then again, High was merely a bear on slower at 49fps, and so you could probably merely virtually get away with that if you really fancied it. Highest, alas, will push that right back down to an average of 33fps, so I wouldn't venture further than High at this detail resolution.
Tin I play this at 4K?
A smaller, merely no less doable yes at this resolution, just we're really pushing the boundaries of what this card's actually capable of here. Y'all'll get the smoothest speeds on Low, naturally, but if y'all really wanted to push the boat out, then Mid volition get y'all a decent, if slightly choppy boilerplate of 35fps.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Despite the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super technically being a step up from the GTX 1660, you probably won't detect much of a noticeable improvement when it comes to doing the tussle tango with the beasts of Monster Hunter: Globe.
Of course, that may be because I've got Zotac's entry-level Twin Fan model on test here, which is one of the cheapest GTX 1660 Supers you can currently buy. With a base of operations clock speed of 1530MHz and a heave clock speed of 1785MHz, this is more than of a baseline Monster Hunter: Earth feel than the absolute all-time case scenario. Every bit a result, you may see slightly higher frame rates on faster, more expensive cards, but I don't think the differences will be large enough to really make that much of a tangible impact on your minute-to-infinitesimal gameplay.
Tin I play this at 1920x1080?
You certainly can. High will see yous fly across the screen with silky frame rates averaging around 81fps, but yous're probably adequately safe in pushing it up to Highest for an boilerplate of 48fps if you really desire to push the envelope.
Tin I play this at 2560x1440?
Yous certainly definitely tin. Mid will get yous a smooth average of 58fps if my tests are anything to become past, but I reckon y'all'll exist perfectly fine pushing it upward to Loftier instead, where I saw an average of 51fps. Highest is just about playable, besides, only with an average frame rate of just 36fps, I don't think the prettier effects are worth the driblet in performance compared to what you go on Loftier.
Can I play this at 4K?
Just about, but the best y'all're looking at is some other average of 36fps on Mid. Instead, stick to High at 1440p for the all-time results.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
If you're looking for the all-time graphics card for 1080p gaming, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is definitely the card to go for right at present - particularly if you want to play Monster Hunter: Earth on the highest graphics settings at the smoothest frame rates. More capable than the GTX 1660 Super, this is the first Nvidia menu that can actually handle Monster Hunter: World'southward Highest setting without breaking out into a sweat.
I've got the Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on test here, which is admittedly ane of the faster types of GTX 1660 Ti out there at the moment thank you to its high heave clock speed of 1890MHz. However, having tested a number of GTX 1660 Ti cards over the past couple of months, even the cheapest GTX 1660 Ti cards are maybe only a maximum of 5fps behind Asus' ROG Strix model, and then the results below shouldn't be too far out of line with what you'll meet elsewhere.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Did your graphics card accidentally wolf downward a palico-prepared meal earlier you turned your PC on today? Because by golly is this ane raring to go at 1080p. Equally I mentioned higher up, this is arguably the best carte du jour for playing Monster Hunter: World on Highest at this resolution, every bit my tests managed an boilerplate frame rate of 58fps when I was out in the field. That'due south much better than the 48fps average offered past the GTX 1660 Super, although if you lot really want to exist sure of a steady, never-dropping below 60fps frame rate, and then yous'll have to make do with 'just' 81fps on Loftier.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Are you certain your graphics carte didn't eat two palico spreads today? In one case once more, this is the first Nvidia card that tin can comfortably push up to High at this resolution, offering smooth boilerplate frame rates of 57fps. Highest is still a bit across the achieve of this detail card, averaging 41fps, but it's likewise not so choppy that yous shouldn't requite it a go if you lot feel like information technology.
Can I play this at 4K?
All right, the palico power meals are starting to run out a bit hither, but you should all the same be able to manage a decent-ish 33fps average on Mid if you really feel up to it.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 is an splendid graphics card for 1080p and 1440p alike, merely always since Capcom added in DLSS support for Monster Hunter: Globe, the RTX 2060 has really come into its own. Able to push much higher into fancier graphics settings, the RTX 2060 is a neat hunting buddy for aspiring dinosaur hat makers.
I've got the Founders Edition on examination hither, which has a base clock speed of 1365MHz and a boost clock speed of 1680MHz. This is fairly typical compared to other third party RTX 2060 cards, a lot of which push button its boost clock speed even college. As a result, these speeds are probably the least you tin await to see from an RTX 2060, with faster cards likely able to clasp even more out of it.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
You certain can, Captain McSlice, and you lot tin can whack it directly up to Highest no problem for a smooth boilerplate of 70fps. No DLSS required.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Affirmative, Lieutenant McDice. If you're not a fan of how DLSS looks in Monster Hunter: World, then your best bet is going to be High at this resolution, where y'all should come across smoothen average frame rates of around 62fps. However, stick DLSS on and you tin easily button it all the way up to Highest, where you'll come across a jump from around 45fps sans DLSS to a smooth 63fps.
Can I play this at 4K?
That's another yes, General ChoppyMcChop, although you'll have to brand practice with Mid here regardless of whether you've got DLSS turned on or not. Without information technology, you tin look an average frame rate of around 35fps, but switch information technology on and that volition leap up to a much more than pleasant 52fps.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
A slightly faster version of Nvidia's GeForce RTX 2060 bill of fare, the RTX 2060 Super offers almost RTX 2070 levels of performance for a lower cost. Information technology's effectively Nvidia's reply to AMD's Radeon RX 5700, which I would normally say is a better value menu than the RTX 2060 Super, but cheers to Capcom's recent addition of DLSS support for Nvidia's RTX cards, this is definitely the card to go for if you desire superlative notch 1440p monster hunting operation.
Nvidia'southward Founders Edition of the RTX 2060 Super is actually exactly the same as their own reference spec this time (the Nvidia Iron version of the original RTX 2060 was overclocked), and then the results beneath should be taken as very much a baseline for RTX 2060 Super performance rather than the absolute limit. As such, y'all may well discover that other RTX 2060 Super cards are a bit faster than what I've detailed hither, but in that location's still plenty of good numbers to run into here, especially if you lot're in the 1080-1440p zone.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Admittedly. No need for DLSS here, equally y'all tin can stick it direct upwards to Highest and enjoy super shine average frame rates of 76fps.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
You sure can. Like the regular RTX 2060, you've got ii options here. An average of 70fps on Loftier without DLSS (or 52fps on Highest), or 70fps on Highest with DLSS switched on. Have your selection.
Can I play this at 4K?
Yes, although yous'll probable have to stick with Mid again here, with an boilerplate of 41fps sans DLSS, or 55fps with.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
With Nvidia's GeForce RTX 2070 Super at present having pretty much replace the existing RTX 2070, this is pretty much the best graphics bill of fare around for admittedly flawless 1440p gaming. That, and AMD's Radeon RX 5700 XT, although you'll probably desire to opt for the RTX 2070 Super for Monster Hunter: Earth, if but thanks to its added DLSS support.
Much similar my RTX 2060 Super carte du jour, the Nvidia Founders Edition of the RTX 2070 Super follows the reference spec for this detail bill of fare to the letter. No overclocking, nothing. As such, this is probably the slowest speeds y'all can expect to see from the RTX 2070 Super – although equally you may take seen from my RTX 2070 Super benchmark showdown with cards from Asus and Zotac, you're not really gaining very much by spending more than on an overclocked card.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Yep! No DLSS required here, no sir. Stick it up on Highest and enjoy smoothen, smoothen dino-slaying at an boilerplate of 88fps.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Yes and yep. Again, in that location's very little demand to stick DLSS on at this resolution, every bit you tin nevertheless enjoy a smooth average of 62fps on Highest without having it enabled.
Tin can I play this at 4K?
Yep and yep. You lot tin can get a very decent boilerplate of 49fps on Mid without enabling its DLSS support if yous want a pure Monster Hunter: Earth experience, but switch information technology on and you'll be able to push much further into those 4K texture packs. On High, for instance, you can await to run across an average of 58fps, which really isn't half bad.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Unlike the rest of the Nvidia RTX Super family unit, the Founders Edition of the RTX 2080 Super is a footling flake dissimilar. Instead of sticking to the base of operations specification, Nvidia have bumped upward the clock speed of its 8GB of retentiveness. Clocked at 15.5 Gbps instead of the usual 14 Gbps like every other RTX carte du jour you tin can buy right now, this gives the RTX 2080 Super a much more noticeable lift over its non-Super sibling than either the RTX 2070 Super or RTX 2060 Super practice with their respective predecessors.
Of course, that'southward true of all RTX 2080 Super cards, just the Nvidia Founders Edition is even so a great card in its ain right. Equally y'all may have seen in my RTX 2080 Super benchmark showdown, where I pitted it against Zotac'southward super fast AMP Extreme edition of the card, they're pretty much neck and cervix, showing y'all needn't spend loads on a more than expensive card but considering its GPU is slightly clocked slightly college. Equally a consequence, the results below should be pretty representative of all RTX 2080 Super cards out there right now, and as you'll shortly see, in that location'southward a lot to like.
Tin can I play this at 1920x1080?
Oh, keep, then, crank it upwards to Highest and enjoy a smooth average of 94fps if you want to. I'm not going to stop you.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Not skillful enough for you lot? Well, how well-nigh 66fps on Highest at 1440p, then? I mean, yous could push information technology higher with DLSS turned on, merely there'due south actually no need.
Tin can I play this at 4K?
All correct, all right. I hear you. Permit'south talk 4K. Sans DLSS, the best yous're looking at is all the same Mid, where you'll get a smooth 53fps, simply switch on DLSS and you're looking at 71fps on Loftier. Heck, I'd even push it to an boilerplate of 53fps on Highest given the hazard. Get on. Y'all know you desire to.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Hands down the globe'due south best graphics card right at present, the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is probably the merely Nvidia card that doesn't need Monster Hunter: World's DLSS support to go the smoothest, bestest best frame rates. Then over again, what do you expect from a thousand quid graphics card? You might desire to switch information technology on if you're playing at 4K on Highest, just otherwise it's pretty much smooth sailing across the board.
Tin I play this at 1920x1080?
Silly question, really. Of course it can. Stick information technology on Highest and savour a silky boilerplate of at least 85fps.
Tin can I play this at 2560x1440?
Another no brainer, to exist honest. Over again, yous'll be perfectly fine whacking this up to Highest at this resolution, where I saw average frame rates all the way up around the 75fps mark.
Can I play this at 4K?
It kinda goes without saying at this betoken, doesn't information technology? Personally, y'all'll probably be perfectly fine coping without DLSS here, as Highest volition still get you a perfectly playable average of 47fps at this resolution. Switch it on, though, and you lot'll be back up nearer 60fps in no time. If you want the purest Monster Hunter: Globe feel, though, then y'all'll probable want to driblet down to High hither for an boilerplate of 64fps.
AMD Radeon R9 270
Pilfered out of an old PC I institute downwards the back of a closet, this v-year-old graphics bill of fare is the high-end baby of AMD'south at present seemingly aboriginal R9 200 series. With a mere 2GB of retentivity and a mighty base clock speed of 920 MHz (920!), this is positively decrepit by today's GPU standards, and then information technology proved when I threw the full weight of Capcom's abominable game at it.
It's still ameliorate than the R7 260X Capcom lists equally the absolute bare minimum spec requirement for playing Monster Hunter: World, simply good gravy if you've still got one of these graphics cards in your PC, do yourself a favour and UPGRADE, GODDAMMIT. It'due south time for something better.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Barely. Even on Mid, the R9 270 just almost managed a steady 30fps on this mode, reaching an absolute maximum of 35fps when I happened to stumble on 1 of its rare empty corner of its vast jungle. Yes, you can ever settle for Low, but really, you might besides throw the bill of fare in the bin at that indicate and buy the console version.
In fact, buy the console version anyhow. It volition probably wait and run ameliorate than anything you tin manage with this piece of junk.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Pffttt. Y'all're having a laugh, right? Moving on...
Tin can I play this at 4K?
Ahahahahahahhahhahah aha hahahahha hahahah aha, no.
AMD Radeon R9 290
Despite belonging to the aforementioned ancient family unit as the R9 270, the R9 290 is, thankfully, a lot more capable than its at present increasingly frail sibling. It'due south got a healthier 4GB of retention, for starters, and a marginally higher base clock speed of 947 MHz. That's still pretty piddly by today'due south standards, only this reference model put up a surprisingly decent fight at both resolutions when I chucked it at Monster Hunter: Globe, almost (just not quite) matching the results of Nvidia's GeForce GTX 970.
That'due south pretty impressive for such an old bill of fare, and I'chiliad sure third-political party models with amend cooling might even be a touch on faster if you lot happen to still exist using one as your main graphics card. It's had a good innings, the R9 290, and will probably continue to exist a decent choice for 1080p gaming for a while longer. Here'southward what it made of information technology.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Surprisingly, yes. Mid produced the smoothest ride through the game's dense flora, averaging a highly respectable 50-60fps, and it even took a pretty good stab at High, too.
Setting the scaling to prioritise resolution gave the best results here, averaging somewhere between 50-55fps when it came to sticking monsters with the pointy end of my dual bract combos, and (assuming you lot're well-versed in making compromises with this kind of card) y'all can just about shunt that upwards to 55-60fps by setting the volume rendering to Low.
To be honest, the R9 290 can even run the game at Highest if you lot don't mind playing effectually the 35-45fps mark, again eeking out an actress five frames on elevation of that past using the same volume rendering play tricks. That'due south actually a bear on ameliorate than what I managed with the GTX 970 on this particular graphics style, which is pretty damn great because its age.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Yous know what? Yes. Just about. I'd recommend going with Mid once more at this resolution, which averaged between 30-40fps depending on how busy the scene was and whether the resident Rathian fancied duking it out with the neighbouring Anjanath that day.
In fact, as long as you're happy with playing at 30fps, you lot can even push the graphics settings up to High and not feel whatever worse for clothing. I'd keep the scaling set to prioritize resolution, though, as opting for High saw a couple of ugly dips to 25fps, whereas the erstwhile pretty much bobbed betwixt thirty-35fps.
Can I play this at 4K?
Ahahahah ahahahahaaaaa, alas not.
AMD Radeon RX 570 (8GB)
Despite getting on a chip, AMD's Radeon RX 570 is still falls nether the recommended PC requirements for Monster Hunter: World, which is good news for anyone hoping to get a chip of dino-slaying action in without upgrading their graphics card. It's still a pretty enervating game, though, so you may have to temper your expectations a little, but on the whole yous should get some highly playable frame rates here.
That said, you may well come across slightly better results than what I've detailed beneath, as PowerColor's Red Dragon version is ane of the slower 8GB cards you can buy right no.w With a boost clock speed of just 1250MHz, information technology's quite a manner behind the very top-end cards with boost clocks up in the mid 1300s. Still, as a baseline experience, in that location's a lot to similar here, then permit's go on down to some of those lovely frame rates.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Yeah indeed. Mid will get you the smoothest average frame rate, settling bang on 60fps in my tests, but yous're probably fairly prophylactic bumping the quality up to Loftier instead. Here, I saw an almost as smoothen average of 57fps, so you may every bit well bask those slightly prettier textures. Highest is doable besides, but here y'all're but looking at a rather choppy average of 39fps.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Just about, just Mid is as practiced as information technology gets here, and fifty-fifty that's a scrap optimistic. Even so, 40fps isn't to be sniffed at, and is even so pretty proficient going for this blazon of bill of fare.
Can I play this at 4K?
Alas, 4K is beyond the RX 570, but then it was never destined for 4K gaming in the beginning place. Stick with 1080p instead.
AMD Radeon RX 580 (8GB)
Much like the RX 570, the 8GB version of AMD'south Radeon RX 580 makes a fine 1080p partner for Monster Hunter: Earth, but falls apart a bit when we bump information technology upwardly to 1440p. However, the RX 580 was never really meant for anything more than a little chip of 1440p gaming, and so this turn of events isn't wholly unexpected.
This particular card is from PowerColor, and is the 8GB Cherry Dragon edition, which has a boost clock speed of up to 1380MHz. This makes information technology i of the faster RX 580s out there at the moment, but I'one thousand confident the results below should still be broadly representative of what's possible on other 8GB RX 580s with slightly slower heave clock speeds.
Tin I play this at 1920x1080?
Yes and yep. You'll become the all-time speeds on High, where I managed a lovely smooth average of 64fps, but if you're fine with a frame rate down in the mid 40s, then you could probably crash-land it all the fashion up to Highest as well.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Sort of, just Mid is actually the best y'all tin can hope for hither. I saw an average of around 45fps at this resolution. Having said that, though, High was only a tad slower with an average of 43fps, so you could probably take a chance that given information technology's simply a couple of frames behind overall.
Can I play this at 4K?
Sadly, 4K isn't actually doable on the RX 580. You could muck about with Low if you actually felt like punishing yourself, or make do with an average of 34fps on Mid, only really, why carp when you tin get a much prettier (and not to mention considerably smoother) monster hunting experience at 1080? and 1440p?
AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD's Radeon RX 590 may not exist widely available at the moment, only human being alive can you pick up 1 of the remaining few models for a right old deal these days. Still, of the few models that exercise notwithstanding exist, XFX's Fatboy is more or less bang in the middle when it comes to base and heave clock speeds. This means that the results beneath should be pretty much representative of what you'll come across on other RX 590s in Monster Hunter: World, which is good news if the results for the RX 580 and GTX 1060 weren't quite to your liking.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Absolutely. Information technology'due south not quite a consistent 60fps, but I constitute an average of 51fps on Highest was perfectly playable during my testing, and it seems a shame to waste matter Monster Hunter: Globe's pretty environments for the sake of 10 frames or so. Of grade, if 50-odd fps isn't to your liking, you tin always knock it down to High, or turn off that volumetric fog.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Yeah and yep. Mid will get you the smoothest speeds at this resolution, averaging effectually 50fps once more, but High doesn't add much of an boosted hitting to your quondam frame rate. Indeed, I saw an average of 48fps on this setting, which isn't really much different from Mid. Highest, on the other hand, will merely get yous around 34fps, then I'd stick to one of the other settings if yous're adamant almost playing at this resolution.
Tin I play this at 4K?
Sort of, but non really. Over again, Mid is your best bet hither, but you're just actually looking at an average frame rate of 36fps overall, so you lot'd be much meliorate off sticking with a less demanding resolution here.
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
AMD's Radeon RX 5500 XT is a real powerhouse for its tiddly price, and I've grouped both the 4GB and 8GB versions of this card together here because their benchmark results are and so gosh-darned like.
The 4GB version is Sapphire'south entry-level Pulse model, while the 8GB version is some other entry-level card from PowerColor. Both represent the cheaper terminate of what'due south available for each type of RX 5500 XT, so the results beneath should be taken as a base line experience rather than the absolute cream of the ingather. Even so, every bit yous'll soon see beneath, at that place'south plenty to like here, specially at 1080p.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Yes indeedy. In both cases, you'll get 60+fps frame rates on High at this resolution, with the 4GB carte du jour offering up an average of 65fps and the 8GB card pushing information technology merely a little higher at 69fps. Highest is doable on both cards, but with an average of just 45fps across both cards, information technology won't be well-nigh as smoothen.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Aye, but Mid is your all-time bet here. Again, both cards produced nigh-on identical boilerplate frame rates here, coming in at 49fps apiece. Turn off that volumetric fog, though, and you should meet at to the lowest degree a small bump to push it over that 50fps line.
Can I play this at 4K?
Alas, 4K is very much beyond the limit of what these 1080p-oriented cards are capable of in this game, so don't fifty-fifty go at that place.
AMD Radeon RX 5700
1 of the best graphics cards you tin buy today for superb 1440p gaming, AMD's Radeon RX 5700 is an absolutely stonking bill of fare for the money. That said, while it beats Nvidia's GeForce RTX 2060 in practically every game going at the moment, it does have the slight disadvantage of not supporting Monster Hunter: Earth's performance boosting DLSS tech. Still, there's plenty of good numbers to adore here, making this still an excellent carte for crafting a new pair of cadger gloves.
This particular edition is AMD'southward own reference version of the bill of fare, so the results below should probably be taken as a bare minimum for what's possible with this card rather than the absolute limit – peculiarly now there are third political party models available to purchase with superior coolers and overclocked boost speeds. Yet, every bit yous'll encounter below, this is still an fantabulous card for hunting some of them at that place monsters.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
Yous betcha. Stick it on Highest and savor polish, dino-slaying frame rates averaging around 73fps.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
You double betcha. High will run across your frame rate stay well above the 60fps line, averaging around 74fps if my tests are anything to go by, simply Highest will nonetheless become you lot a very playable average of 51fps as well.
Can I play this at 4K?
You triple betcha, but simply merely about. Mid is playable at an average of 41fps, merely really, you'd exist improve off sticking with 1440p in this case. Not only will you go faster performance, but you'll also get a better looking game to boot.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
I do love my slightly melty-looking AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. Information technology might give me a modest panic assault every time I accept it out of my PC when it's still a bit warm, but this is all the same 1 of the best graphics cards you tin can purchase today for flawless 1440p gaming.
Indeed, much like the regular RX 5700, there's at present no existent reason to settle for one of AMD's reference models of this detail carte du jour, as there are now enough of faster and better-cooled editions available from 3rd political party manufacturers. Equally a event, you'll probably get slightly faster speeds from ane of those than what I've detailed beneath. Either style, though there's still enough to like here, regardless of model type.
Can I play this at 1920x1080?
A big tick for this one. Crank it upwardly to Highest and enjoy a shine average of 82fps for your trouble.
Can I play this at 2560x1440?
Two ticks here. Once once again, yous've got enough power here to put it straight upwardly to Highest and go a lovely average of 59fps here, although if y'all actually want to be on the safety side, and then perchance an average of 83fps on High will do instead?
Tin can I play this at 4K?
By golly, the RX 5700 XT has only gone and got three whole ticks. Who'd have thought!? Like other AMD cards I've detailed here, there's really non that much deviation between Mid and High for a card of this calibre, then yous may also bump it up to High and enjoy a highly playable average of 44fps at this resolution. Sure, it won't exist quite as smooth as playing at 1440p, but when Mid will only get you an boilerplate of 46fps, it's hardly worth making the drop for the sake of ii extra frames. So get and bask those high res textures. You lot deserve it.
Monster Hunter World Graphics Settings,
Source: https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/monster-hunter-world-pc-performance-best-settings-for-iceborne#:~:text=Monster%20Hunter%3A%20World%20comes%20with,overall%20performance%3A%20Volume%20Rendering%20Quality.
Posted by: ratliffdefought.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Monster Hunter World Graphics Settings"
Post a Comment